However, I pause in my ceaseless labor for the cause of world peace and the establishment on the international level of a version of the Reed College Office for Multiculturalism and Diversity, at the event of yet another American election. Random observations, from afar:
-- As a native Californian, I warmly welcome Governor Jerry Brown back to the governor’s chair. While I agree with Moonbeam on exactly nothing, there is not the slightest doubt in my mind that he, unlike the hopeless RINO hack he was running against, is not in it to advance his career or be the man in the spotlight. In his own way, he loves California and cares about it, something he inherited from his father, and in any case it was Democrats who ran the state into the ground, so it’s only right that Democrats be on the hot seat to clean up the mess. In any case, I wasn’t going to get a governor who was to adopt Arizona-style sense against the on-going invasion, so I may as well get someone and something that is at least recognizably Californian. Plus, to my delight, the Dead Kennedy’s immortal “California Uber Alles” is now current and contemporary once more.
(More, er, controversial take following the jump!)
-- The story of this election, to read the dead tree, dead mainstream media, is a Republican surge that re-took the House. Ha! Talk about missing the forest for the trees. I mean, yes, this occurred, but it isn’t the *story*.
No, the story is something like this: Once upon a time, in a place called America, due to an historical accident, there lived among the largely European settlers and their posterity a sizable minority population. In time, the people of this minority came to point out the lack of consistency between American theory and American practice and called for fairness and equality. The majority was convinced by this argument, and conceded the point. Having conceded the point, the new men in power then took up that concession and used it as a club to beat the majority. Eventually, it was decided that the majority itself was inherently suspect, the mere presence of a majority child was said to cause psychological harm to minority children. The country before the concession became not the past but a catalogue of Crimes Before Enlightenment, sundering the American people from their own past.
To redress this evil, ever greater power was needed, and ever greater transfers of wealth. In order to really, really, really prove that the concession was genuine, the decision was made further to invite many other minorities to America so we could demonstrate that the historical mission of the U.S. is to prove that there are no differences among people at all, of any kind.
That this infusion of Third World labor also enriched many while allowing the majority to feel smugly superior in a not-too-open way also didn’t hurt.
But, to the majority’s shock, a new era was not ushered in. Instead, every re-affirmation of the concession led to more demands, and finally it was impossible not to notice that every race was effectively organized on the basis of race and voted and even functioned in open caucus in the Congress on the basis of race, but that of the Majority-Scheduled-To-Be-Minority.
And, so, the reasons that lead to the great concession have begun to appear less important, and more distant, and even more irrelevant. And in its first experience in openly non-Majority government, the great mass of the Majority, found themselves moving into new territory, slowly flexing muscles long unused. Polarization on the basis of race has set in, the multi-cultural experiment walks but is actually dead, and in the great heartland of the Majority, the de-facto Party of the Majority has been founded, even though everyone but they themselves already think of the Rs as that Party.
No, the House is not the story. The Story is the Radical Realignment of White America, in a manner not seen since Reconstruction. Not the House, but the State House is the story, as was just quietly reported at The Corner:
Still trying to chase down results in key legislative races around the country,
but at the moment it looks like this:
• Going into the 2010
elections, Democrats held 60 partisan legislative chambers and Republicans held
36, with a couple of ties.
• It looks like the GOP has picked up an
astounding 20 chambers, including both houses in Alabama, Maine, Minnesota, New
Hampshire, North Carolina, and Wisconsin and additional chambers in Indiana,
Iowa, Michigan, Montana, New Hampshire, Ohio, and Pennsylvania.
•
In total legislative seats, it is possible that after all the results are
posted, Republicans will have won a nationwide majority.
•
Republicans haven’t enjoyed this much power in state capitals since the
1920s.
This process is just beginning. It won’t end pretty. But Progressives have only themselves to thank. Had they accepted color-blindness and been reasonable on immigration, we’d all be looking forward to a stable, mature America. Instead, unable to resist the temptation of the will to power and their own tribal interests, they have forced the issue. And this isn’t South Africa, we are not merely a handful in a sea. And if the pathetic opposition to the liberal order presented by the mere Tea Party was enough to provoke the Establishment into outrageous over-reaction, just wait and see what they do when their pressure throws up ever more radical Majority leaders.
I take no pleasure in reporting this; it simply is what it is and we will all live with the awful consequences before it is sorted out.
-- The House GOP will revert to form by Jan 25. Except, this time, more than just conservatives will take note of it.
-- I note with a mixture of fascination and horror that with two very real, and very, very expensive wars on, that neither were anywhere near a factor in any election. While the USG care very much about the Iraqis and the Afghans, it is clear that Americans care about Americans, or to be more exact, their kind of Americans.
-- Welcome back, New Hampshire!
-- The WSJ's exit poll data show the following on race:
Blacks: 90% Democrat 10% Republican (I believe this must be an historic high)
Latinos: 66% Democrat 33% Republican
Asians: 56% Democrat 41% Republican
Others: 55% Democrat 42% Republican
Whites: 38% Democrat 59% Republican
Aarrgghh! "Read More after the jump" code doesn't seem to work for me.
ReplyDeleteVIKRHAM!! HELPS!!!
Mr. Jourdand00dsir - there is no problem at all your codez work veddy well indeed sir.
ReplyDelete<desi->off/>
See, there's a lil' cognitive dissonance thing with the "Read More" feature...
...you write your stuff, you post, you hit "View Blog", and there's your post - your full post, unabridged by the "Read more..." code.
And you're like f**k why won't this work...
...yeah. Been there, done that.
Thing is, what you're looking at is your post, not the "front page".
On the "front page", the "Read more..." code has done it's thing and works just fine.
So it's all good - you just have to remember to take a glance at the front page when you use the "Read more..." code.
I did take the liberty of adding a youtube link to your DK reference, Jourdan. Hope you don't mind! Dang it's been like thirty years since I heard that song...
ReplyDeleteI don't know, Jourdan. I don't see a "radical realignment of White America". *shiver*
ReplyDeleteI do see a radical realignment, but from where I sit it's based on a push-back against the progressives. The tea party adherents aren't drawing a line in the sand between the races that I can see. Look at the candidates we worked so hard to elect! Allen West, Susana Martinez, Marco Rubio, and Nikki Haley are all staunch conservatives, and could probably argue this point much better than I.
Personally, I'm fed up with the whole race issue. Most Americans are a true "melting pot" of races, so what does it matter? The whole sociological definition of "minority" is bunk, and a construct of "do-gooders" who must always have a victim to champion. The damage these people have done by clucking over people who happen to possess a teaspoon more melanin may be irreparable. The entire concept of entitlement spending grates badly on the nerves of the remaining few who actually work and who personally foot the bill for treating a vast swath of fellow citizens like a special class, unable to even feed and shelter themselves without "help" from Uncle Sam. It's sickening; democrats in general, and progressives in particular, excel at keeping their "inferiors" cooped up in ghettos, dusting them off long enough to vote. This is why the election appears to be race-based, but it's not. It's ENTITLEMENT based. I'd love to strike the word "race" from every language on earth.
The answer must be personal responsibility and self-reliance if we are to survive. The cookie jar is empty. Let the chips fall where they may.
I refuse to participate in a race war. If the fists start flying, would the Whites throw me to the other side? Not the people I associate with, thank God. No, if push comes to shove, I'll stand with people like Jindal, West, Martinez, Rubio, and Haley. They're MY tribe, I respect them, and they speak for me and many other conservative fuddy-duds.
Does anyone else here see this election as a flexing of White muscle? No sugar-coating; tell us how you REALLY see things. We can't fix something that's not on the table to be dissected and examined from every point.
I think "tribe" is a good way to put it. Who constitutes your tribe? I think the US has been unique in that where you came from didn't so much matter as how willing you were to embrace the western ideals (which admittedly seem to have become defined as "white") on which it was based - personal responsibility, hard work, rule of law, self-determination, etc.
ReplyDeleteIf those things have somehow become inherently "white", then I guess this election could be seen as white muscle flexing. I don't see it that way; I see it as an attempt to return to values that made this nation what it was.
That's an interesting take on the situation, Jourdan, but I'm not seeing the race-based realignment. I'd have to agree with lady red that the election was less driven not by race, but by the issue of entitlement. The groups, or tribes, behind the vote seem to be divided more or less along geographical lines. Of course, those geographical lines do often coincide with racial lines, but I'd be inclined to think that's just a result of larger factors (which I am ill-equipped to even try to discuss).
ReplyDeleteThere certainly are cultural factors at play, which- again- share racial lines. However, they're not necessarily a consequence of race; but more a progression of one's upbringing. If you just happen to a latino boy, born into poverty and your family is subsiding on the government's dime, then you are more inclined to to feel entitled to certain handouts. And it doesn't make it any easier for you if you local officials push handouts on you, rather than provide opportunities for you to make it on your own.
A somewhat related story...
ReplyDeleteAt a local diner that we go to about once a week, we usually have a "favorite" waitress whose section we seek out. For a while our waitress was a middle-aged Greek woman, who would talk endlessly about how much better things were back in "her country". She would tell us "Oh- the medicine here, it is so expensive" and "I don't understand why you have to pay for (insert entitlement here)!" Well, I always did my best to bite my tongue (she was a great waitress) and when she announced last year that she was "going home" I wished her the best of luck.
Well... of course you know what happened... she has returned to the good ol' USA. Apparently she couldn't find work back home, and the handouts really weren't all that great after all. I'd like to think that she "get's it" now, that it's better to work and have to freedom to choose how best to spend your hard-earned pay, than it is to be at the mercy of the state and get whatever they give you. Time will tell.
I'll make my comment by way of analogy:
ReplyDeleteIsrael has an official policy with respect to nuclear weapons:
Israel will not be the first to introduce nuclear weapons in the Middle East.
I would propose:
Tea Partiers should not be the first to inject race into any given political dispute.
Just sayin'.
I'd like to think that she "get's it" now
ReplyDeleteHmmm... It would seem that I've subconsciously decided to make up for the dearth of apostrophes here on TCKT.
lewy14- I don't know of any Tea Partiers who would do so.
ReplyDeleteAlphie - no, me neither - but this fine gentleman at DailyKos is itching to go full retard nuke.
ReplyDeleteActually, he is doing us the favor of letting us know what he's really thinking. And I know from experience (having spent time on the leftist reservation in my youth) that these sentiments are not uncommon.
They are common enough that they must be dealt with.
And sweet reason won't reach these people.
Whoa. lewy, that was... enlightening. I even waded into the comments - and was (sadly?) pleasantly surprised to see that they mostly not frothing crazy. Maybe there's hope after all.
ReplyDeleteWow lewy, that was certainly a weird stroll through Batshit Crazyland. He was so far out that even some the Kos folks were chucking rocks at him.
ReplyDeleteYou're right, though. We need to know what people are really thinking.
The rabid liberal view of their "shellacking" in this election is that the defeat p-r-o-v-e-s they are right, and the majority is too dim to grasp it. See...it's "proof" either way, win or lose. Got it?
ReplyDelete