Friday, December 31, 2010

A Film You Must See



What makes a compelling movie? That is a difficult question to answer. The only thing I can do is look at films I have seen and can see over and over again. Then the answer begins to come into focus. The words responsibility and respect start to ring.

A compelling movie has someone who, no matter what his position or responsibility, must stand up and face challenges greater than himself and, while doing it, earns respect and also learns to give respect.

The King's Speech is such a film. It is the story of Albert, Duke of York, the second son of King George V. The Duke spoke with a stammer since he was a young boy. Inasmuch as he was the second in line for the throne, the stammer was more of a family and personal embarrassment than a national problem. He is fortunate in having a loving, devoted wife who believes in him. After exhausting just about every mainstream therapist, she finds a controversial one. His name is Lionel Logue. When the Duchess interviews Logue, she at first does not let on the true identity of her husband. When Logue finds out, he agrees to take on the Duke as a patient, as long as there is trust and equality between them.

Every part in this film is finely acted. To see these performances is to see fine artists at the top of their craft. Colin Firth brings a vulnerability that is merely a shell that covers an inner strength – a shell that needs to be stripped away. Helena Bonham Carter shows a love and devotion that helps bring her husband to be the man history demands he be. Geoffrey Rush is the therapist who knows how to do what others before him have been unable to do.

This is a touching movie. To hear the Duke struggle as he tries to speak is heartbreaking. This is a hilarious movie. No, this movie is not a comedy, but it respectfully finds humor in the lives it portrays. Most of all, this is a movie about respect and what proves to be an enduring friendship.

David Seidler who, too, suffered from a stammer when he was young wrote the screenplay. He heard about the story and felt that he needed to tell it to a bigger audience. He had the class ask the Queen Mother for permission. She agreed – as long as it was not during her lifetime. Not knowing that the Queen Mother would live to be 101, Seidler agreed -- and therefore it took thirty years before he brought the story to life.

There is controversy about the film. It was given an adult rating because of the use of foul language – specifically the “f” word. This language is not gratuitous, however. It seems that some of the few words the Duke can say without stammering are obscenities. Other than those outbursts, the language in the film would probably earn it the lowest “PG” rating. The usage is important, as it shows that the Duke’s temper overcomes his insecurity. This shows that it is possible to overcome that insecurity.

Do yourself a favor: don’t wait for it to come out on DVD. See this film in a theater. Then buy it on DVD when it comes out. I seriously am considering seeing it in the theater again. Don’t worry; you aren’t likely to be distracted by rowdy teenagers on this one. We were probably the youngest people in the house.

18 comments:

  1. Great review Matt. Wonderful film, I enjoyed every second.

    Firth & Bonham-Carter are excellent. Rush is exquisite.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for the post and the articulate review, Matt. I had been debating what movie to see this weekend and you have sealed the decision. And what an interesting back-story re the Queen Mother's request. Considering how it all worked out so well in the end I wonder at her reasoning.

    ReplyDelete
  3. She said that the memories were too painful for her.

    Another sidenote to the story is that the original script had Logue as being an irreverent and cocky Australian for the sake of being an irreverent and cocky Australian. Then his journals were found in a gradnson's attic, and this new added information gave depth to the character.

    I am confident that you will enjoy this film very much. I sincerely believe that this will be looked at as a classic

    ReplyDelete
  4. Matt, thanks for the review, I plan to go see it... I look forward especially to seeing the young Queen Mother come to life - I'd only ever known her as an old woman.

    It was always hard for me to imagine her as "the most dangerous woman in Europe" as Hitler called her. Obviously she had formidable character; it will be great to see a portrayal of her.

    ReplyDelete
  5. There are a number of things in the film that give you a glimpse of things to come. Seeing the Queen Mother's devotion shows why she was so beloved. Seeing the King also showed me the same thing. I came away with the sense that Logue being the way he was helped make King George the King for the people as he proved to be, and was needed to be.

    The matter of his smoking also came up a number of times, albeit subtly. At one point, the King coughed -- I took it as an omen of the cancer that was to kill him.

    ReplyDelete
  6. lewy, here are a few images of the Queen Mother as a young woman:

    img:"http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y113/phasewest/2884834750_4c8ca30499.jpg"

    img:"http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y113/phasewest/2811929166_5ecc7f5677.jpg"

    img:"http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y113/phasewest/qmothera.jpg"

    ReplyDelete
  7. This sounds wonderful; I love Colin Firth and Geoffrey Rush. Helen Carter too, I guess I'm over her stealing Emma Thompson's husband away...

    I adore films from this era and I think we will make the effort to see it in the theater. Matt, you missed your calling, you write a terrific review.

    I won't miss the teenagers in the audience :-)

    Happy New Year to all my friends here.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The problem with being a movie reviewer is that I would have to see the dreck that comes out of Hollywood these days. There is no coincidence that it has been a year since we have seen a new release in the theater. We have seen the three classics, but they are on a different level.

    Thank you very much for the compliment, Florie. I have wondered if I could make it as a reviewer. I appreciate Lewy and Luther's comments and compliments as well.

    And happy new year to all my friends at the table. May 2011 be a great year for us all.

    ReplyDelete
  9. "I guess I'm over her stealing Emma Thompson's husband away..."

    Did she? I thought that they got together after Branagh's marriage had already broken down. Either way, I'm sure Branagh would have come to his senses sooner than later and dumped that anti-semitic, socialist, wind bag Thompson.

    "Thompson has said of her religious and political views: "I'm an atheist; I suppose you can call me a sort of libertarian anarchist. I regard religion with fear and suspicion. It's not enough to say that I don't believe in God. I actually regard the system as distressing: I am offended by some of the things said in the Bible and the Qur'an, and I refute them." She told the BBC Andrew Marr Show in March 2010 that she had been a member of the Labour Party "all my life." Thompson is also a Palestinian human rights activist, having been a member of the British-based ENOUGH! coalition that seeks to end the "Israeli occupation of the Gaza Strip and West Bank.""

    ReplyDelete
  10. Happy New Year florrie! Thanks for your card, it arrived today, beautiful pic.

    ReplyDelete
  11. The film sounds wonderful Matt! I hope that Noah and I have a chance to see it in a theater. Your review really brought it to life.

    Happy New Year to everyone! May the coming year be kind to us all.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Fay, the photographs are mesmerizing. She was very beautiful as a young lady.

    ReplyDelete
  13. OMG! Did anyone see Dick Clark??? WTH happened to him and why would they wheel him out in the condition he's in?

    His face looks like a Thunderbirds puppet face and his voice sounds like a computer generated drone.

    That is just so sad and soooo wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Great review Matt. It is now on my list of must see. Colin Firth just keeps getting better and better.

    Happy New Year to all in TCKT, may we go from strength to strength in 2011!

    ReplyDelete
  15. Matt - _amazing_ movie. Sincere thanks for posting your review - not sure I would have gone to see the movie otherwise - my wife and I went this evening and it was utterly compelling and absolutely wonderful.

    As it happens, our theater was mostly filled with young people - who laughed their asses off at the funny bits, watched in stone silence in the poignant and solemn scenes, and raved enthusiastically afterward. Very, very subversive, this movie!

    (Speaking of subversive - I can't help but think this movie is going to be seen as politically charged in Britain - especially in royal circles - and taken as reading on current circumstances. I'll leave that alone, or for another discussion).

    Fay - thank you for posting the pictures of a young Lady Elizabeth - I'm especially struck by the last one... she seems to have poured herself into that photograph; she is serene and imploring at the same time...

    ReplyDelete
  16. Lewy, I am glad you enjoyed the film. It is good to hear that a young audience could appreciate the film as well.

    There is something about experiencing a good film in a theater. A good audience reaction almost help you pick up on things that you may have misses. When we saw Casablanca a few months ago, I was surprised at how funny the film was -- which was driven home by the audience reaction.

    I, too, have wondered about the modern comparison to The King's Speech. I think Charles out Edwards Edward. I just don't know who the George is in the shadows.

    ReplyDelete