For more than 2,500 years, mathematicians have been obsessed with solving for x. The story of their struggle to find the “roots” — the solutions — of increasingly complicated equations is one of the great epics in the history of human thought.
And yet, through it all, there’s been an irritant, a nagging little thing that won’t go away: the solutions often involve square roots of negative numbers. Such solutions were long derided as “sophistic” or “fictitious” because they seemed nonsensical on their face.
To put in simply:
Ah, but then John Hubbard from Cornell added computers to the equation! What do we have? Why, fractals, of course!
In conclusion,
Hubbard’s work was an early foray into what’s now called “complex dynamics,” a vibrant blend of chaos theory, complex analysis and fractal geometry. In a way it brought geometry back to its roots. In 600 B.C. a manual written in Sanskrit for temple builders in India gave detailed geometric instructions for computing square roots, needed in the design of ritual altars. More than 2,500 years later, mathematicians were still searching for roots, but now the instructions were written in binary code.
I love this stuff, don't you?
Anticipating EWOK head explosion in 3..2..1..
ReplyDelete" Have you ever lazed in the sun on a balmy spring day, pondering the mathematical concept of i2 = –1? "
ReplyDeleteEr...not since I gave up hard drugs.
Lady Red, I love you. Will you marry me?
ReplyDeleteStop encouraging him lady red. he thrives on this stuff.
ReplyDeleteI'm with aridog...
Does anyone want me to repeat my explanation of how to figure square roots?
ReplyDeleteMatt, LOL! I knew you and Lewy would get a kick out of this thread!
ReplyDeleteI get no kick from champagne.
ReplyDeleteMere alcohol doesn't thrill me at all
So don't pour any into tumblers.
'Cause I get a kick out of numbers.
Thank you. I'll be here all week.
Does anyone want me to repeat my explanation of how to figure square roots?
ReplyDeleteIs that the doorbell? Gotta run...
I know, Lady Red has to watch her paint dry.
ReplyDeleteI've been watching paint dry most of the day, up close and personal. I'm a little kinky and stiff, but the kitchen trim is looking goooood. Geez, the window over the kitchen sink had me twisted like a pretzel! Noah had a good laugh...
ReplyDeleteI stuck him with painting the laundry room. He had to wrestle a washer, dryer, and freezer in and out. Hah!
Every spring I torture him with projects. And he likes it! (I think) ;D
I'm a little kinky
ReplyDeleteUmmm, did we need to know that?
Sorry.
Couldn't resist.
LMAO!
ReplyDelete/blushing
I like the pretty colors and the tiny bubbles. Especially the blue ones. They're fractalicious!
ReplyDelete:OD
Does anyone want me to repeat my explanation of how to figure square roots?Actually, that would be good. Never did know how to do that.
ReplyDeleteCan it be done with pretty color pictures?
I don't know about colors, but I found it. The formatting did not work out very well, though. Email me if you want me to try again, but here is (copied) what I posted before:
ReplyDeleteCalculating a square root by hand is similar to division. Since we have been talking about the number 1000, I will use it to explain the process.
First, set up the process similar to division, splitting up the number in groups of two, going right to left from the decimal point (if there is an even number of numbers, then the left most one is a single digit) and going left to right in groups of two.
/ 10 00. 00 00
Start by figuring out what number, when squared, will be equal to or less than the first set of two (which, in this case, is the number 10). That would be 3:
3
3/10 00. 00 00
1
Then drop down the second set of two numbers.
3
3/10 00. 00 00
1 00
Then it begins to get a bit confusing. You double the previous working number, in this case three, and you double it. You then put an underscore after it:
3____
3/10 00. 00 00
6_ 1 00
Then you need to figure out what number when put in the ones column (in this case, consider the 6 as being in the tens column) AND multiplied by that number will be equal to or less than the “dropped down number. In other words, using our example, what number N will give you N((6*10)+N) that is equal to or less than 100. In this case, that number is 1: 61*1 is equal to or less than 100, whereas 62*2 is larger than 100.
3 1___
3/10 00. 00 00
61 1 00
39
Now you do that step one more time:
3 1.___
3/10 00. 00 00
61 1 00
62_ 39 00
What number when put in the ones position added to (64*10) and then multiplied by that number (((64*10)+N)*N) will be equal to 3900? This may take some trial and error, but let’s try 6.
3 1. 6___
3/10 00. 00 00
61 1 00
626 39 00
37 56
1 44
Now we drop down two more zeros and carry on as before:
3 1. 6____
3/10 00. 00 00 00
61 1 00
626 39 00
37 56
632_ 1 44 00
In this case, let’s just figure 2”
3 1. 6___2
3/10 00. 00 00 00
61 1 00
626 39 00
37 56
6322 1 44 00
1 26 44
17 56
Just keep going on as far as you want to carry it.
Aren’t you glad you asked?
Good job we don't have to pay for using up space here!
ReplyDeletehehe TY Matt!
ReplyDeleteAnd hey Fay - if we did have to pay for space, why, we could just get one of those Paypal donation buttons and the money would just roll in all by itself from cyberspace! :OD
Or we could get those awful google ads with scantily clad women selling....stuff unrelated to their state of undress.
LOL mw!
ReplyDeleteJust read Matt's comment. Now I've got a headache before breakfast! What's wrong with using a calculator? After all, isn't that what G-d invented them for?
ReplyDeleteI'm with Fay and Aridog on this one too. :-)
Or we could get those awful google ads with scantily clad women selling....stuff unrelated to their state of undress.
ReplyDeleteAwful, those ads. I can find much better looking scantily clad women...
...and soon I'll be able to post them in the comments! ;)
I'm working on the image posting hack right now. I'm not even stopping to read this thread. 8P
Hopefully we'll have an alpha version soon.
... what? there were numbers with those letters? huh.
ReplyDelete