Friday, July 15, 2011

The New Soviet Power

Even for someone like me who has declared the Republican party dead and the conservative press less than useless, the commentary surrounding the debt limit crisis is nothing short of remarkable. Seeing columnists like Krauthammer and Coulter complain that the House Republicans are losing the public relations battle is astonishing. Do these two really think that there is any other possible outcome? Do they really believe that the press coverage can be affected positively by actual Republican actions?

The other thing that is striking is how shrill that media and the ruling elite are in the face of such monstrous enemies of peace, freedom, justice and sound economic policy like Cantor, “Boner” (seriously, is that your name?), McConnell and Hatch. That even such ineffective and self-evidently insincere opposition can cause the Establishment to go in full panty-twist mode is really satisfying. I just can’t wait to see their heads explode when they deal with a real opposition.

You may remember that I was strongly opposed to TARP, TARP II, the AIG bailout, the GM bailout, the Fannie Mae bailout and the “stimulus” package, all for the same reason: it was all borrowing money which will have to be repaid to both pay-off the powerful and influential, who cannot be allowed to fail despite their ceaseless rhetoric regarding the free market, and major constituencies who are insolvent and largely helpless without Federal aid.

Raising the debt ceiling does nothing more than put us deeper in the hole and make the eventual crash worse. It was again obvious that once the Treasury was busted open (and, note, not by socialist Democrats but by the disastrous Bush family and the Wall Street big boys) the run on free money would never stop, certainly not in a democracy, where the people can always just vote themselves money.

The madness of the current regime is obvious once you take a step out of it. Rather like being a refusenik during the Soviet Union, it really doesn’t matter what the details are between those in favor of increasing the rate of collectivized agriculture or those in favor of keeping it as is with a marginal private market for small plots—as interesting as that debate may be and as indicative of who in Moscow holds the whip hand.

No, the whole thing is mad and such a debate is merely the mass delusion of people who are not functioning in reality.

And so it goes today in Washington.

In other news, not entirely unrelated, the United States was one of the first nations to recognize Africa’s newest country, the newly independent Republic of South Sudan.

This new republic’s government’s first act was to declare the nation under a food, environmental and humanitarian crisis and ask for immediate cash aid from Western nations. A call which the United States answered immediately, with millions of U.S. dollars now flowing.

Independence = Dependence
Fiscal Crisis = Millions Spent
Massive Borrowing = Fiscal Responsibility

This will not end well.

4 comments:

  1. Jourdan, nice post. I substantially agree.

    I have a different opinion regarding TARP I; seemed like the right thing to do at the time. Still not convinced it was wrong.

    Certainly by QEII, the financial establishment had completely lost me.

    As for Republican culpability - fair enough. That W. had completely destroyed the "fiscal conservative" credibility of the Republican party is well established.

    But I'd point you also to Walter Russell Mead's fine post on a book by Gretchen Morgenson - http://www.amazon.com/Reckless-Endangerment-Outsized-Corruption-Armageddon/dp/0805091203. The Democrats in general and Barney Frank in particular are deeply implicated in the Fannie/Freddie mess. (Morgenson is an NYT writer and has received kudos from The Nation, btw - no old school Republican hack journalist she!)

    And Grahm/Leach/Bliley was heavily backed by Bill Clinton's Treasury Secretary, Robert Rubin. (D-Plutocracy).

    Etc.

    The sad fact is that the origins of the credit crisis, both real estate and sovereign, had broad bipartisan and public support, for a very long time.

    And that said: I have a feeling this is going to get very ugly indeed - it's going to be very hard for any kind of deal to happen.

    But it's time to get stubborn.

    What's the worst that can happen? Very bad things, actually - maybe - or maybe not. I have a suspicion we may soon find out. And Jourdan's point that we're f**ked sooner or later anyway is quite true - true, in fact, for the entire developed world (US/EU/Japan), which implicates demographics and human nature.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jourdan said....

    ... the whole thing is mad and such a debate is merely the mass delusion of people who are not functioning in reality.

    And so it goes today in Washington.


    Perfect summary IMO. Unfortunately, it appears to be both sides. Long ago when this all began I believe I disagreed with some of your positions ... hindsight being 20-20 I see you were right in most instances.

    One cannot spend communally or individually funds that will n-e-v-e-r be there. QE = Fook You, repeat, don't bother to rinse.

    Just reading and thinking about the overall debt issue actually, literally, gives me a headache of the migraine variety. N-o-t-h-i-n-g makes any sense now. The Democrats have managed to get the Republicans fighting amongst themselves ... a perfect way to lose an election otherwise theirs to win. Nothing new there.

    Beyond that, the Obamney/Pelosi health care plan is a bridge too far, period. No matter if it is an abomination or the best thing since 1776, whatever, it is simply not affordable and rife with lies and deceptions on costs and funding ... among other things , it relies on more taxes for those 51% of us who still pay taxes, and is STILL affordable.

    Seriously ... I am retired, without "earned income", by choice, and I still pay income taxes(due I presume to my distributions of sheltered 401K deposits). I read about the end of charitable deductions ... big F'ing whoop, it's been years since we were able to use them, even though we average 10 to 15% household income per year in such. Hell of an idea anyway, let government hire 50 people per task to do what a few do now voluntarily, without government ... SES uber alles. Better all y'alls money than mine? Sh*t!

    But now it is serious and I am infuriated that the fate of the nation has now become a "game" of who can look good for 2012 ... e.g., who will "own" the debacle? $%$^&*(#$%^&** !!!! ... just insert every Anglo-Saxon curse you can imagine plus a few Hanguk.

    What can I do? Not a g-d thing. I have never been this negative in my life and I do NOT like it.

    Pass me the happy pill (that doesn't require I move to Vienna, damn'it ... thought I'd no doubt love it there, old friends et al., ... Pray, Montana might be okay with a cabin up about 8,000 feet with a barricaded 20 acres around it inside of 500 acres over all, patrolled by a new community "Vigilance Committee."

    ReplyDelete
  3. Correction to what I said here ...

    " ... it relies on more taxes for those 51% of us who still pay taxes, and is STILL UNaffordable."

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree with you too Jourdan. I composed a big ol' long comment this morning, but deep sixed the whole thing when I realized I was just parroting your observations.

    Great post.

    ReplyDelete