Saturday, March 13, 2010

It is reassuring to know that only governmenty-type people who ask can have your private census info

I'm kinda shocked at how many people have no problem atall with the govt GPSing their front door, but it's been fun to hear of all the incidents where the GPSer was escorted off properties by upset homeowners.
...Title 13 requires the Census Bureau to keep all information about you and all other respondents strictly confidential,” the release of the “strictly confidential” data was also perfectly legal:....under the terms of the USA PATRIOT Act...

In preparation for this year’s census, 140,000 workers were hired to collect GPS readings for every front door in the nation. Such pinpoint precision will certainly simplify the process of locating any individual or group that may be identified as a threat to “national security” in the future. Remember, for example, the 1976 Senate Report in which 26,000 Americans were slated for roundup by the FBI in the event of a national emergency at the height of the Cold War. Now that the U.S. Government’s Terrorist Watchlist has exceeded one million, the GPS data acquired could be instrumental in accomplishing such a roundup.
While reassurances are repeated that the data is held under the strictest security, and will only be used for innocuous projects like “government programs and solutions to our problems,” do we really want academics to social engineer policy solutions based on sensitive personal data?...

...Many will no doubt choose to follow former Senate majority leader Trent Lott’s advice to skip any Census questions they feel violates their privacy—which may well include any exceeding the Constitution’s mandate for an “actual Enumeration.” Unfortunately, choosing privacy now costs more: legislation recently passed raises the fine for “anyone over 18 years old who refuses or willfully neglects to complete the questionnaire or answer questions posed by census takers” from a limit of $100 to $5,000—a fact not advertised even in the small print.

The Independent Institute

9 comments:

  1. Wait a minute, are you kidding me??

    I wasn't going to answer anything but name & address; aren't there some legal eagles taking on this frickin' unconstitutional outrage?

    Like the Thomas More Law Ctr?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm sure there are constitutional lawyers who are attacking this, but I don't know how they'll do - they're being bombarded from so many sides right now who knows if there's even enough of them to fight all the junk that's coming down the pike?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I filled out our census the other day. There are only a few questions. I declined to give them my phone number (none of their business. If they want to fine me, bring it on). Other than that, they wanted the names of anyone who lives in our home, age, sex, and birthdate. Oh, and race. All the Hispanic divisions were ridiculous. How come they don't divide "white" into umpteen divisions? Bah.

    I'm of two minds about the GPS. With the consent of the homeowner, having this information is vital to LOCAL emergency services. However, the feds have no business with that information.

    We weren't home when the census people left the form on our door. I wonder if they GPSed us? If they did, I'm NOT a happy camper. At all.

    ReplyDelete
  4. George Carlin always said on forms for ethnicity he listed "blue-eyed devil", I think I'll do the same only substitute green :-)

    Or else simply leave it as "Martian".

    ReplyDelete
  5. Funny that people of Egyptian decent are not allowed to say "African," even though Egypt is and always was in Africa.

    On employment forms, I always mistrusted the EEO forms if they included my name or had to be included with the application. Of course they say they are voluntary -- but you know how much consideration your application would receive if you did not include it.

    ReplyDelete
  6. We haven't got our Census form yet...maybe this week.

    Or we'll get a door to door census taker? With Ari and Dera going beserk at the window, maybe I'll invite him/her inside?

    ReplyDelete
  7. "How come they don't divide "white" into umpteen divisions?"

    Because it does not matter. All whites are devils, and there is no reason to seperate one from another, eh?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Years ago someone in CA applied for a job as a black man. He was white (very), but the employer was not allowed to question his ethnicity.
    So I spose you could say whatever you want :OP

    I kinda like...what was that one category? Aleut?

    ReplyDelete