Friday, September 2, 2011

The NYT Skewers Obama, Boehner

Even the Messiah Times has had enough of the petty bickering in Washington (it's petty bickering when the Repubs win an argument, but brilliant leadership if the Dems come out on top).

The contemptuous reaction from the House speaker, John Boehner, to the president’s request to address a joint session next Wednesday — the day Congress returns from its summer recess — was appalling. No matter how he feels about Mr. Obama personally or politically, there can be no excuse for his lack of respect for the office, to which he is second in the line of succession. And it was distressing to watch President Obama fail, once again, to stand up to an opposition that won’t brook the smallest compromise.

What made this even more appalling is that the president will be speaking on the country’s most pressing problem — the need to create jobs and stave off another destructive recession.

Of course, the Dems never disrespected President Bush. Nope. Also, the Times is "appalled" that Boehner prevented Obama from upstaging the Republican debate. Appalled, I tell you! Personally, if Obama has some grand plan up his sleeve to jump-start this economy, I'm appalled that he didn't cut short his vacation to share it with the rest of us.

It's becoming increasingly clear that Obama is not a leader, nor does he possess the "brilliance" the slobbering progs bestow upon him with absolutely no evidence of the fact. He's a man who has never had a real job or solved a real-world problem. Has he even balanced his own checkbook? It's "appalling" that we elected this guy! The independent thinking was "gawd, he CAN'T be worse than Bush (McCain)!" and the liberal thinking was "hey, it's time for a black man to be prez. See how progressive and civilized I am! Excuse me while I pat myself on the back.". Unions and able-bodied public assistance recipients were giddy with glee, embracing the notion that Obama would heap money on their gravy train.

Now we're swirling the drain while our President cowers in his corner, blubbering at his czars to "fundamentally change" everything in sight to the point of breaking our nation. I don't have high hopes for Obama's speech next week; fixing this mess will involve creativity, versatility, and superior leadership skills. Over the course of nearly three years in office, Obama has exhibited none of these traits.


18 comments:

  1. I'm an opinionated old hen, aren't I?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yeah. :) But they be good opinions!

    Really though, perhaps in the long run this will have been a good exercise for the country in the sense that perhaps people will once again pay more attention to the value and ramifications of their vote.

    Then again, who the hell am I trying to kid. I read this morning that here in Arizona Hispanic groups want the redistricting process to create several congressional districts with locked in Hispanic majorities. Same as was done for blacks under the Voting Rights Act. More splintering, more fractures, more special interests, more Maxine Waters. Doesn't do 'America' a damn bit of good I think. Just further divides us.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I nearly fainted when I saw the White House attributed quotes about this on Politico this morning.

    And I thought I was beyond being flabbergasted.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The President it supposed to quietly ask the Senate and the House what an agreeable date would be to speak in front of a joint session. It is not up to the President to tell them WHEN he is going to speak before them.

    The President gets it wrong (again) and it is Boehner's fault? Well, it IS the New York Times.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Part of the quotes from Politico:

    Yet the White House did not see this as an obstacle. “With all due respect, the POLITICO-MSNBC debate was one that was going on a cable station,” the White House source said. “It was not sacrosanct. We knew they would push it back and then there would be a GOP debate totally trashing the president. So it wasn’t all an upside for us."

    Dude - they were only on CABLE. So what's the problem? Deal. It's not like it's important, anyway.

    The White House is viewing it as very consequential, however. “It is a big deal,” the source said. “It shows the House Republicans will do no outreach, nothing.”
    And who does the White House believe was really behind treating the president so shabbily?

    “At first, I didn’t think it was Boehner, but his caucus,” the source said. “But maybe not. Maybe it is him.”


    WTF is this? Third grade?

    I'm not a Boehner fan by ANY stretch, but it isn't even about defending him or Republicans. At some point, we're supposed to put away the crayons and stop bogarting the art table's jar of paste. Apparently, the "source" in the White House never got past that stage.

    ReplyDelete
  6. What else can you expect from bird cage liner?

    ;-)

    lol, they call Boehner's reaction "appalling". Yawn. I think he (Boehner) should have taken the high road and let Obama have Wednesday, what difference does it make? This way, they both look petty and partisan. Oh well, at least he didn't cry.

    Sheesh, no wonder everything in DC is so fucked up.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Look, the little Jug Eared Messiah is not going to propose anything worthwhile next week. This is all charade what with his needing to speak to a joint session of Congress. Bullcrap ... the White House has already announced this week they don't think unemployment will fall below 9% or so over the next couple of years. In short, "Bush did it" and more radical socialization is required to right the ship.

    I for one think Boehner reacted just fine. The POTUS does not dictate Congressional sessions to Congress...at his convenience,no less, on the first day in session since the summer break.

    As for WH blabber mouth Jay Carney ... we all now know how Ferris Bueller turned out once he changed his name.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Only on cable? Only? The last time I (or anyone I know) watched network news (NBC, CBS, ABC, CBC) I think Nixon was President. As for MSNBC, I think Grover Cleveland was still in office.

    The "media" is so full of shit now that they bullshit each other as often as the public.

    Absolutely none of this means anything. Nothing what-so-ever.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Boehner should have taken the high road and let The Messiah have his day?

    Like that would have made any difference, other than telling The Messiah that Congress was at his beck and call?

    You don't think that first thing Thursday morning The Messiah would have been complaining about the Republicans still, yet, again?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Don't be mean to me, boys, I'm a sensitive butterfly!

    And before I forget again, something for RWC on his special day...

    img:"http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y117/floranista/helen.jpg"

    ReplyDelete
  11. Apropos of nothing, I was just reading comments elsewhere about the JEM's decision to stop the implementation of the latest rule from the EPA. Some sense, finally.

    But, the second comment in on that thread 'the children' were brought up. You all know what I mean.

    So, I'd like to propose a corollary to 'Godwin's Rule'. When 'the children' is brought up by one side in a discussion, the discussion is thereby forfeited in favor of the opposing side.

    florrie... that was a mean thing to do to RWC. :))

    ReplyDelete
  12. That's RWC's barber. I'll have to go over to the old coal-generated computer to find the picture of her cutting his hair.

    I'm sure everyone else knows what you mean, Luther, but "the children" reference went right over my head. I'm going to need more info :-)

    ReplyDelete
  13. ta daaaaaa!

    img:"http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y117/floranista/rwcsbarber.jpg"

    ReplyDelete
  14. Luther said...

    Apropos of nothing, I was just reading comments elsewhere about the JEM's decision to stop the implementation of the latest rule from the EPA. Some sense, finally.

    JEM boy says he would suspend EPA's implementation of its latest massive rule making and regulatory reach until 2013.

    Problem is that 2013 is right around the corner in investment terms, so there's no real relief for businesses. Next, he hasn't actually done it yet.

    What you have at present is a sound bite. Period. If he does act, you then have a band aid on a sucking chest wound.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Excuse my poor writing skills, florrie. By 'the children' is the meme of it's 'for' the children. From which springs many of the lame-headed regulations we now live with on a daily basis. Prime example would be Mayor Bloombery of NY city.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I would need a barber if my barber looked liked that. My hair would just fall out!

    ReplyDelete
  17. Thanks, Luther, that makes sense.


    Yes, right before every school year starts, they drag that one out to rationize striking. One city here in Washington set a record for their length of absence from the classroom.

    But it's FOR THE CHILDREN, doncha know?

    Hypocritical a-holes.

    ReplyDelete