Saturday, March 16, 2013

Wall St hauled way more loot from Detroit than Kwame ever did.

Walter Russel Mead draws a typically broad-minded and even-handed picture of today's urban corruption in general, and Detroit's in particular.
During the long grim slide, much of Detroit’s population fled the implosion; those who remained suffered through declining city services. Schools, police, fire, infrastructure: all the vital services cities are supposed to provide have gone into steep decline. 
But while the city’s mostly low-income and mostly African-American residents struggled to survive civic decline, the ill wind from Detroit blew somebody good: well connected Wall Street firms have feasted on the Motor City’s carcass. 
I know the Wall St banks are in it for themselves but the scope of fees extracted from Detroit is shocking even to me.

Mead links a Bloomberg article that has more details on the banks, and on the breakdown for that near half billion dollar bill owed by broke Detroit...
Banks including UBS AG (UBS), Bank of America Corp.’s Merrill Lynch and JPMorgan Chase & Co (JPM). have enabled about $3.7 billion of bond issues to cover deficits, pension shortfalls and debt payments since 2005, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Liabilities rose to almost $15 billion, including money owed retirees, according to a state treasurer’s review. 
The debt sales cost Detroit $474 million, including underwriting expenses, bond-insurance premiums and fees for wrong-way bets on swaps, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. That almost equals the city’s 2013 budget for police and fire protection. The largest part is $350 million owed for derivatives meant to lower borrowing costs on variable-rate debt. 
Municipal borrowers from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California to Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, have paid billions to banks to end interest-rate swaps that didn’t protect them. In the bets, a municipal issuer and another party exchange payments tied to interest-rate indexes.
Yep, the same interest rate swaps which burned Larry Summers while he was screwing up Harvard University in between his stints screwing up the US economy in an official capacity.

The fact that Detroit was able to dig a hole so deep speaks to a city budgeting process which is delusional and criminally reckless at best.

And what about JP Morgan? The testimony of the JP Morgan employees at Friday's Senate hearing exposes Jamie Dimon as a mendacious thief, and a careless and arrogant one at that.

Who will be held responsible? Nobody. Who will profit? JPM. Who will pay? We will.

But you probably already knew that.

12 comments:

  1. And another reason to resent Wall St... they have made Microsoft Excel a de facto standard.

    I'm taking a finance course on Coursera and I have to go buy Excel to do the assignments.

    I thought I could skate by using Google Docs and the Apple spreadsheet but no such luck; all the templates employ Microsoft-specific features.

    Damn you Jamie Dimon. Damn you Lloyd Blankfein.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That is because Excel is by far the best spread sheet, best database compatible (it is in fact a database itself), out there. Nothing anyone else produces comes close. :D

      And...if you'd called or emailed me I'd have gotten you a license and download for about 25% of retail....legally. :)

      Delete
  2. There is an open-source system that I believe is compatible with Excel (or any of the Microsoft programs).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Matt, thanks...

      The course uses optimization routines in the "Solver" package. The free spreadsheet programs have similar functionality, but not identical...

      You know with a bit of messing around I'm pretty sure I could have gotten libre office or open office to work... but I got lazy and just wanted something that would "just work" out of the box and I could use the spreadsheet files that the course supplied without mucking with them.

      I might take some courses at University of Washington in quantitative finance this fall and so I figured it was time to bite the bullet and pay the Microsoft tax.

      Delete
    2. Yes, it was :-)

      You gummint runs on it, time you did too. :D

      Delete
  3. Hey, I find that the Microsoft products don't work that well between computers sometimes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They work fine even on old systems IF you download the patches to make old Excel, Word, Access etc. compatible with new versions. One thing I do and have for years, is keep my MS stuff current...even when the Army didn't.

      Delete
  4. An update - I asserted that the recent Senate testimony showed just how criminally insane things had gotten at JPM but I didn't provide a link.

    Here's one. Gretchen Morgenstern is known for being a implacable on this topic and nonetheless manages to get published in the NYT.

    Here's the kicker:

    JPMorgan, don’t forget, is the largest derivatives dealer in the world. Trillions of dollars in such instruments sit on its and other big banks’ balance sheets. The ease with which the bank hid losses and fiddled with valuations should be a major concern to investors.

    As for taxpayers, the Senate report clearly indicates that JPMorgan Chase is too big to regulate. The report found that the bank failed to provide crucial portfolio data to its regulators at the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and that those regulators did not investigate questionable trading at the bank. The overseers accepted the bank’s assurances that nothing was amiss.

    We already know that banks of JPMorgan’s size are also too big to be allowed to fail and too big to prosecute. Such banks are too big to regulate and apparently too big to manage. So how much more evidence do we need that banks like JPMorgan are simply too big a risk for taxpayers to bear?


    Gretchen's gonna be accused of being one of those "Teabaggers" with talk like that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lewy ... admittedly I am not a finance expert, mostly I run on gut instinct. For all the reasons cited in this post and comment string, I DO NOT TRUST BIG BANKS AND DO NOT LIKE THEM EITHER.

      However, the problem:

      1. Who enabled this growth and power to sell shit and call it sugar plums?

      2. What choice(s) do we have now?

      Delete
    2. Did I mention that to my simple [likely ignorant] mind "derivatives" of any kind are hocus pocus equivalents to selling road apples and calling it draft live stock.

      The road apples are derivative, after all. :-(

      My favorites are those that bundle up say a hundred extremely poor risk securities and then rate the "derivative" bundle as AAA based upon the probability feature that they might not all fail simultaneously. Of course...they can fail in domino order at the speed of light[as they did recently] and what have you then?

      Harness up those road apples and yell giddy-up! Oh, wait...

      Delete
    3. Need I add that I was and still am intensely opposed to the elimination of Glass–Steagall restrictions on banks versus investment houses.

      Fox meet hen house. Bankers meet whorehouse. Note: I actually like some whores (financial managers), but I just prefer they not sleep with everyone's money.

      Delete
    4. How do you lose billions as a trader...

      Like a Man? Like a Boss?

      No... like an emo-boi.

      Delete